From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 4 21:38:33 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FBA4106566C; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:38:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lacombar@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ww0-f50.google.com (mail-ww0-f50.google.com [74.125.82.50]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 055468FC12; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 21:38:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by wwe3 with SMTP id 3so1448733wwe.31 for ; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:38:31 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=nqahgjBPNOUVfQe8nBDQi4kt7ZDEBzxW4uBRNtpJffk=; b=InyYVZtf24JVIGTgr2nbVCtEbKK7mgWTPceusOB+eb7daZHmONpIsQi23DWFII7Qi0 cJhq2M1iojgG+4LIDx5S9iz97QUFA5AiolLnC9mgCkhX8BGK8iblPqL6NimO7vTg9Yib 9Vm6zslv76lVLrpIzsqYvNNf9YqLIps9ikj4c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.227.153.211 with SMTP id l19mr2049777wbw.51.1317764311765; Tue, 04 Oct 2011 14:38:31 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.180.103.33 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Oct 2011 14:38:31 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <1317260554.93406.33.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <1317754080.15870.0.camel@bauer.cse.buffalo.edu> <4E8B6382.1060001@buffalo.edu> Date: Tue, 4 Oct 2011 17:38:31 -0400 Message-ID: From: Arnaud Lacombe To: Joshua Boyd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Andrey Fesenko , freebsd-current , freebsd-stable , Ken Smith Subject: Re: FreeBSD 9.0-BETA3 Available... X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2011 21:38:33 -0000 Hi, On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 5:30 PM, Joshua Boyd wrote: > On Tue, Oct 4, 2011 at 4:56 PM, Arnaud Lacombe wrote: >> >> Had you loved so much to have this information, you would have given >> me credential. >> >> I may have filled in all the date from publicly available material, >> might it be from mailing list, or from FTP server's timestamp, or SVN >> revision date. If I had not been able to determine a date, I may just >> have left it blank and asked for details, eventually. >> >> Unfortunately, we will never know. > > It's nice that you want to help, but could you be less of a jerk about it to > the people who devote a huge amount of time to the project? > Which ones: - those who do not upgrade release information in release cycle ? - those who commit broken stuff ? - those who knowingly misdocument interfaces ? - those who ignore obvious fixes ? - those who ignore users request ? - those who ignore users bugs ? - those who refuses to share their work-in-progress ? - those who tell you you're wrong for months to finally acknowledge you are right, and commit your fixes ? ? Thanks, - Arnaud