From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 19 13:52:44 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F2CD31065670; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ACEA08FC1B; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:52:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter-phk.freebsd.dk [192.168.48.2]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B04D13F43; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:52:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q4JDqa7P014165; Sat, 19 May 2012 13:52:36 GMT (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Konstantin Belousov From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 19 May 2012 16:40:05 +0300." <20120519134005.GJ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:52:36 +0000 Message-ID: <14164.1337435556@critter.freebsd.dk> Cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org, Robert Millan Subject: Re: headers that use "struct bintime" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 May 2012 13:52:45 -0000 In message <20120519134005.GJ2358@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>, Konstantin Belous ov writes: >> Or maybe "struct bintime" be defined unconditionally? I think this is the best/right way to go. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.