From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 25 12:58:41 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E3F6B106564A; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:58:41 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B02C68FC08; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:58:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (66.111.2.69.static.nyinternet.net [66.111.2.69]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4156946B17; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:58:41 -0500 (EST) Received: from jhbbsd.localnet (unknown [209.249.190.10]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 530A88A009; Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:58:40 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: Remko Lodder Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:37:42 -0500 User-Agent: KMail/1.13.5 (FreeBSD/7.4-CBSD-20110107; KDE/4.4.5; amd64; ; ) References: <201102241613.p1OGDXpM047076@svn.freebsd.org> <20110225070237.F983@besplex.bde.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <201102250737.43182.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.6 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Fri, 25 Feb 2011 07:58:40 -0500 (EST) X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.96.3 at bigwig.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.5 required=4.2 tests=BAYES_00,MAY_BE_FORGED, RDNS_DYNAMIC autolearn=no version=3.3.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on bigwig.baldwin.cx Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, davidxu@freebsd.org, Bruce Evans , svn-src-head@freebsd.org, Remko Lodder Subject: Re: svn commit: r219003 - head/usr.bin/nice X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2011 12:58:42 -0000 On Friday, February 25, 2011 5:23:04 am Remko Lodder wrote: > > On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:47 PM, Bruce Evans wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011, John Baldwin wrote: > > > >> On Thursday, February 24, 2011 2:03:33 pm Remko Lodder wrote: > >>> > > [contex restored: > > +A priority of 19 or 20 will prevent a process from taking any cycles from > > +others at nice 0 or better.] > > > [strip information overload]. > > So, what is the consensus instead of overwelming me with too much information? Take that sentence out. It is not accurate for our schedulers. -- John Baldwin