From owner-freebsd-arch  Mon Jun  3 16:25:13 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org
Received: from obsecurity.dyndns.org (adsl-63-207-60-56.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net [63.207.60.56])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9A2BD37B401; Mon,  3 Jun 2002 16:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obsecurity.dyndns.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 3949166C49; Mon,  3 Jun 2002 16:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 16:25:09 -0700
From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org>
To: Bruce Evans <bde@zeta.org.au>
Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.ORG>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: Removing wait union
Message-ID: <20020603162508.A34224@xor.obsecurity.org>
References: <20020602010108.B16166@espresso.q9media.com> <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5.1i
In-Reply-To: <20020603011903.Y2566-100000@gamplex.bde.org>; from bde@zeta.org.au on Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:22:14AM +1000
Sender: owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-arch.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-arch>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-arch>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Jun 03, 2002 at 01:22:14AM +1000, Bruce Evans wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2002, Mike Barcroft wrote:
>=20
> > Does anyone have any objections to removing the deprecated 4.2/4.3BSD
> > wait union in <sys/wait.h>?  It's been deprecating since Rev 1.1 and
> > there are only a few consumers in the base system.  Attached are two
> > patches, one to removing it from <sys/wait.h> and the other to remove
> > its consumers.  Changes to lpd(8) sent directly to its maintainer.
>=20
> I think the only potential problem is use of the compatibility cruft
> in deprecware outside the base system.  It would be useful to have a
> quick way to determine how many ports a change in a standard header
> affects.

I'm always happy to test proposed patches on the ports cluster.

Kris

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQE8+/rUWry0BWjoQKURAoc1AJ9DfgkeWMjOFrfKhaRqoW0HTYjOEQCgpq+2
43QlUzTdjMYaVH8g0uN/Tsw=
=AC41
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--ReaqsoxgOBHFXBhH--

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message