Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2015 19:23:48 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Alejandro Imass <aimass@yabarana.com> Cc: jail@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" <mwlucas@michaelwlucas.com>, Sean Chittenden <seanc@groupon.com> Subject: Re: preferred jail management tool Message-ID: <20150127012347.GA4940@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <CAHieY7TyxzC0aK-ErY2EbCmTJPykk_9G7Gd=CrZ9yxQ-77PynA@mail.gmail.com> References: <CACfj5vKjiQHsy9VbOKFFcrBpyr3dmbkOOxTxCYhSyZrnrjRiaQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAHieY7TyxzC0aK-ErY2EbCmTJPykk_9G7Gd=CrZ9yxQ-77PynA@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > For years I've used and endorsed ezjail, but as stated, it is depreciated. Hmm, there's no notation at http://portsmon.freebsd.org/portoverview.py?category=sysutils&portname=ezjail , nor in the Makefile AFAICT. > > For a book, excluding ezjail would exclude a huge portion of the user base > > and seems like it would hurt credibility given its dominance as the > > preferred tool for jail administration. > > > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 12:54:50PM -0500, Alejandro Imass wrote: > Maybe is something obvious to the more technical crowd but as a user what > does "depreciated" mean in this context? Really the word most people use is "deprecated" rather than "depreciated". It can mean any number of things: - it no longer works due to changes in other software - it has been replaced by something else - the author is no longer interested in maintaining it and so forth. I don't know the answer in this case. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150127012347.GA4940>