From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 26 02:58:16 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 78BCF1065675 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 357948FC17 for ; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:58:16 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Received: from r55.edvax.de (port-92-195-8-131.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.8.131]) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BD173CBDF; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:58:14 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r55.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r55.edvax.de (8.14.2/8.14.2) with SMTP id n5Q2w8kZ005113; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:58:09 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:58:08 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Erich Dollansky Message-Id: <20090626045808.fb3b0c8d.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: <200906261033.58894.erich@apsara.com.sg> References: <4A430505.2020909@gmail.com> <200906260955.50697.erich@apsara.com.sg> <20090626040230.18f606b1.freebsd@edvax.de> <200906261033.58894.erich@apsara.com.sg> Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 2.4.7 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd7.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: bf1783@googlemail.com, Manish Jain , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org, Erik Osterholm Subject: Re: The question of moving vi to /binHi, X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: Polytropon List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 02:58:16 -0000 On Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:33:56 +0800, Erich Dollansky w= rote: >=20 > On 26 June 2009 am 10:02:30 Polytropon wrote: > > Polytropon > > From Magdeburg, Germany >=20 > big brother is watching me. Yes, Dr. Sch=E4uble does so. :-) > An xterm just came up with this message: >=20 > "The default editor in FreeBSD is vi, which is efficient to use=20 > when you have learned it, but somewhat user-unfriendly. To use=20 > ee (an easier but less powerful editor) instead, set the=20 > environment variable EDITOR to /usr/bin/ee" >=20 > Isn't this the best reasoning why it should stay as it is? The ee editor isn't that bad. Especially ^K and ^L are more easy to use than vi's edit buffer equivalent. While there's ed and ex in /rescue, ee isn't. % which ee | xargs ldd /usr/bin/ee: libncurses.so.7 =3D> /lib/libncurses.so.7 (0x28088000) libc.so.7 =3D> /lib/libc.so.7 (0x280c6000) Relies on ncurses, but so does dialog / sysinstall... --=20 Polytropon >From Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...