From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Sat Dec 16 13:41:39 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: current@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 476B916A403;
	Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:41:39 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (nagual.pp.ru [194.87.13.69])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5014543C9E;
	Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:41:38 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: from nagual.pp.ru (ache@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBGDfbNL001955;
	Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:41:37 +0300 (MSK)
	(envelope-from ache@nagual.pp.ru)
Received: (from ache@localhost)
	by nagual.pp.ru (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) id kBGDfbl5001954;
	Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:41:37 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from ache)
Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:41:36 +0300
From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org>
To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20061216134136.GB1754@nagual.pp.ru>
Mail-Followup-To: Andrey Chernov <ache@freebsd.org>,
	Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org>, current@FreeBSD.org
References: <20061216055903.GA2712@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20061216111656.GA7501@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20061216112117.P72986@fledge.watson.org>
	<20061216114426.GA7735@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20061216120746.E72986@fledge.watson.org>
	<20061216125136.GA1094@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20061216125419.J72986@fledge.watson.org>
	<20061216131135.GA1393@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20061216131715.C72986@fledge.watson.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20061216131715.C72986@fledge.watson.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Cc: current@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: sysv_ipc.c broken in v1.30 (was Re: sysvshm appearse broken in
	-current)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 13:41:39 -0000

On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:24:59PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote:
> control implementation is structured.  A bug in the new ipcperm() may well 
> be triggering the appearance of the error, but it appears also to be a 
> product of incorrectly structured code in the existing shared memory 
> implementation. The long-term goal is to have a correct implementation of 
> the new code, not simply revert to the old code.

Well, in case t-shm tests will pass, any re-structuring will be fine 
for me.

> >>failure. It could be that both a bug in ipcperm() and a big in shmget()
> >
> >I'll try to make ktrace output, a bit later.
> 
> That's not what I asked for.

In that case I'll be delayed for a longer time - right now -current is not 
bootable - fatal trap due to kmacy@ changes.

-- 
http://ache.pp.ru/