Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2006 16:41:36 +0300 From: Andrey Chernov <ache@FreeBSD.org> To: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.org> Cc: current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: sysv_ipc.c broken in v1.30 (was Re: sysvshm appearse broken in -current) Message-ID: <20061216134136.GB1754@nagual.pp.ru> In-Reply-To: <20061216131715.C72986@fledge.watson.org> References: <20061216055903.GA2712@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216111656.GA7501@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216112117.P72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216114426.GA7735@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216120746.E72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216125136.GA1094@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216125419.J72986@fledge.watson.org> <20061216131135.GA1393@nagual.pp.ru> <20061216131715.C72986@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Dec 16, 2006 at 01:24:59PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > control implementation is structured. A bug in the new ipcperm() may well > be triggering the appearance of the error, but it appears also to be a > product of incorrectly structured code in the existing shared memory > implementation. The long-term goal is to have a correct implementation of > the new code, not simply revert to the old code. Well, in case t-shm tests will pass, any re-structuring will be fine for me. > >>failure. It could be that both a bug in ipcperm() and a big in shmget() > > > >I'll try to make ktrace output, a bit later. > > That's not what I asked for. In that case I'll be delayed for a longer time - right now -current is not bootable - fatal trap due to kmacy@ changes. -- http://ache.pp.ru/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061216134136.GB1754>