From owner-svn-src-all@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Oct 25 03:55:31 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4AE71065670; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from harmony.bsdimp.com (bsdimp.com [199.45.160.85]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A8108FC14; Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:55:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.bsdimp.com (8.14.2/8.14.1) with ESMTP id m9P3sZMf015679; Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:54:36 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@bsdimp.com) Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 21:54:35 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <20081024.215435.74734191.imp@bsdimp.com> To: xcllnt@mac.com From: Warner Losh In-Reply-To: References: <20081024.165035.41635952.imp@bsdimp.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 3.3 on Emacs 21.3 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: svn-src-head@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, marcel@FreeBSD.org, bms@FreeBSD.org, src-committers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r184194 - in head/sys: conf mips/conf X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 25 Oct 2008 03:55:32 -0000 From: Marcel Moolenaar Subject: Re: svn commit: r184194 - in head/sys: conf mips/conf Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 16:04:44 -0700 > On Oct 24, 2008, at 3:50 PM, Warner Losh wrote: > > >> Please provide other grounds for reversal. > > > > (1) You didn't ask us first. > > This is no grounds for reversal. It is weak.. > > (2) Others have said this is a bad idea. > > People were confused about the change. Some people were confused, but others knew exactly what you did and still didn't like it. > > (3) There's appears to be a conensus that we should move the other way > > from what you are doing. > > Ok, this I buy. If people agree, we can discuss the > scope and impact of the new route. If it's not too > big a job I'll do the back-out by implementing it or > otherwise I'll just back out this change and forget > about it. Does that sound like a plan? Sounds good. Let's figure out where we want to go, and live with this in the interim. If we can't agree by, say, the end of MeetBSD, then backing out sounds like a plan. Would you like for me to write up what I had in mind as a starting point since I objected to this solution? Warner