From owner-freebsd-doc Mon May 20 8:40:24 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from sccrmhc03.attbi.com (sccrmhc03.attbi.com [204.127.202.63]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 939A537B414; Mon, 20 May 2002 08:40:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org ([12.233.149.189]) by sccrmhc03.attbi.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.27 201-229-121-127-20010626) with ESMTP id <20020520154013.FMZR19355.sccrmhc03.attbi.com@bmah.dyndns.org>; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:40:13 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4KFeCXu038743; Mon, 20 May 2002 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) id g4KFeCZd038742; Mon, 20 May 2002 08:40:12 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200205201540.g4KFeCZd038742@intruder.bmah.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.5+ 20020506 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Tom Rhodes Cc: bmah@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Doc tagging In-reply-to: <20020520111828.5ae920c0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> References: <200205200405.g4K456fp034778@intruder.bmah.org> <20020520111828.5ae920c0.trhodes@FreeBSD.org> Comments: In-reply-to Tom Rhodes message dated "Mon, 20 May 2002 11:18:28 -0400." From: bmah@FreeBSD.org (Bruce A. Mah) Reply-To: bmah@FreeBSD.org X-Face: g~c`.{#4q0"(V*b#g[i~rXgm*w;:nMfz%_RZLma)UgGN&=j`5vXoU^@n5v4:OO)c["!w)nD/!!~e4Sj7LiT'6*wZ83454H""lb{CC%T37O!!'S$S&D}sem7I[A 2V%N&+ X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 08:40:12 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org If memory serves me right, Tom Rhodes wrote: > > > > According to the 4.6 release engineering schedule... > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/releases/4.6R/schedule.html > > > > ..the doc tree is scheduled to be tagged around 27 May 2002. This is > > possibly subject to change, since Nik is (I think) still traveling. > > At the last BSDCon, some of us talked about a voluntary doc slush to > > make life easier for the translation teams, which would last around a > > week or so. Nothing has been officially sanctioned, but we're almost > > at that week (yes, it sort of crept up on us). > > > > You are correct, the time has come for a doc freeze, as ports is just > about to get one... Lets do this realisticly, and from the 27th of > May on all commits should be passed through a senior -doc hacker, > and this be respected and treated in a way similar to the src/ports > freeze. Tom, please go back and re-read my original message, carefully. Somehow, either you misunderstood the two main points of my message, or I failed to communicate them clearly. First, the doc tree will be *tagged* on 27 May. This means that any changes after that date will *not* make it into 4.6-RELEASE unless someone (usually this means Nik) slides the tag on some file(s) forward. Second, I am not in any way suggesting that we need a doc freeze (in the src/ sense of the word), which is why I avoided using the word "freeze" in my original message. Realistically, the middle of the release cycle, less than two weeks before the release, is not the right time to abruptly impose additional requirements for commit approvals. I wanted to people to keep in mind the implications of their work on the translation teams, and to try to avoid unnecessary, last-minute churn in the doc/ tree. Got it now? :-) Bruce. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message