Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:35:09 +0100 From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de> To: Walter Schwarzenfeld <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: print/cups overhaul (PR 207746) side-effects Message-ID: <E37F832A-6C2E-4CEC-B61B-FD9912AB30CE@waschbuesch.de> In-Reply-To: <56E43B01.2020506@utanet.at> References: <537AB8F5-D4EE-4778-B169-43D3A7DA9F73@waschbuesch.de> <56E43B01.2020506@utanet.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 12.03.2016 um 16:51 schrieb Walter Schwarzenfeld = <w.schwarzenfeld@utanet.at>: >=20 > Where is the problem? There is only one "big" port (llvm36). Will be = sstimate 1 !/2 hours. Poudriere and more synth often wants more. Re-reading the messages, I realize that I blew this out of proportion. = Sorry for that. What remains is that I dislike it if package defaults get more greedy = with regards to their dependencies. I try avoiding that whenever feasible. But I guess one could argue that the real problem is that my build-box = is simply too slow. :-/ Martin=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E37F832A-6C2E-4CEC-B61B-FD9912AB30CE>