From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Aug 18 21:01:47 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67F816A4DA
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:01:47 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from bsdlists@rfnj.org)
Received: from mail.rfnj.org (ns1.rfnj.org [66.180.172.156])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1878443D45
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:01:45 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from bsdlists@rfnj.org)
Received: by mail.rfnj.org (Postfix, from userid 58)
	id D4951179A; Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:01:44 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on rfnj.org
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.1 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, MISSING_SUBJECT 
	autolearn=disabled version=3.1.0
Received: from localhost (localhost.rfnj.org [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.rfnj.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26AC7160F
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:01:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from 70-91-197-168-busname-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
	(70-91-197-168-busname-newengland.hfc.comcastbusiness.net
	[70.91.197.168]) by www.rfnj.org (Horde MIME library) with HTTP;
	Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:01:43 -0400
Message-ID: <20060818170143.45o3ka4fvs4oksck@www.rfnj.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 17:01:43 -0400
From: Allen <bsdlists@rfnj.org>
To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=UTF-8;
	format="flowed"
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
User-Agent: Internet Messaging Program (IMP) H3 (4.0.4)
Subject: (no subject)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 21:01:47 -0000

Just curious, does is there any way to make the tun(4) device behave 
like gif(4) does with net.link.tun.parallel_tunnels=1 set, or is a 
patch to do this easy to produce?

Having a problem with ppp creating tun(4) devices where one side of the 
tunnel is the same, and I don't see a way to make ppp use gif(4) 
devices rather than tun(4) which would seem to be the other options.

Thanks.