Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 12 Feb 2001 22:47:47 -0800
From:      Kent Stewart <kstewart@urx.com>
To:        Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com>
Cc:        Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: soft updates performance
Message-ID:  <3A88D893.ED6442EA@urx.com>
References:  <81045.982046200@winston.osd.bsdi.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> 
> > One other point that I would like to understand is why -j4 takes
> > longer on all of my systems. That goes against what everyone claims
> > should happen.
> 
> With how many running processors?  If you're running -j4 on a
> uniprocessor system, you're only introducing competition for already
> scarce CPU resources, though -j2 can be a speedup since this allows
> one target build to run while another is in an I/O wait.  I've only
> seen a speedup with -j4 when using at least 2 CPUs.

It was a uniprocessor system. The folklore has it doing more but all I
ever saw it produce was more competition, which resulted in a longer
running buildworld.

Kent

-- 
Kent Stewart
Richland, WA

mailto:kbstew99@hotmail.com
http://kstewart.urx.com/kstewart/index.html
FreeBSD News http://daily.daemonnews.org/


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3A88D893.ED6442EA>