From owner-freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Jan 5 15:47:26 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97A2716A4CE; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:47:26 -0800 (PST) Received: from hood.oook.cz (hood.oook.cz [212.27.205.50]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61AB243D1D; Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:47:24 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: from hood.oook.cz (localhost.oook.cz [127.0.0.1]) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i05NlNbu028942; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:47:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from pav@localhost) by hood.oook.cz (8.12.10/8.12.10/Submit) id i05NlNZQ028941; Tue, 6 Jan 2004 00:47:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: hood.oook.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org using -f From: Pav Lucistnik To: Joe Marcus Clarke In-Reply-To: <1073346203.765.210.camel@gyros> References: <1073346203.765.210.camel@gyros> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="=-fucQCjDdwTSTnjfFJxeb" Message-Id: <1073346443.5353.36.camel@hood.oook.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Ximian Evolution 1.4.5 Date: Tue, 06 Jan 2004 00:47:23 +0100 cc: freebsd-gnome@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: RFC: Restructuring GNOME meta-ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org List-Id: GNOME for FreeBSD -- porting and maintaining List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2004 23:47:26 -0000 --=-fucQCjDdwTSTnjfFJxeb Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable V =FAt, 06. 01. 2004 v 00:43, Joe Marcus Clarke p=ED=B9e: > I was thinking maybe we should borrow something from garnome seeing as > since they've borrowed practically everything from us already ;-) (the > ports system, that is). What if we restructured the GNOME meta-ports to > look something like this: >=20 > x11/gnome2 (leave it the way it is) > x11/gnome2-lite (leave it the way it is) > x11/gnome2-fifth-toe (Will consist of the following): > graphics/gthumb2 news/pan2 net/gnomeicu2 > x11-toolkits/gnome-themes-extras sysutils/gkrellm > graphics/gimp-devel www/bluefish-devel > net/tsclient graphics/sodipodi > security/seahorse ftp/gftp net/gossip > audio/rhythmbox net/straw > multimedia/totem mail/balsa2 > irc/xchat2 net/gaim www/galeon2 > audio/jamboree Three messengers and two very similar music players? > x11/gnome2-power-tools (New meta-port consisting of the following): > devel/gnomevfs-extras sysutils/gnome-pkgview > misc/quick-lounge-applet x11/gswitchit > editors/dasher net/netspeed_applet > editors/gedit-plugins deskutils/gdesklets > net/gnomenetwork net/gnomenetstatus Looks good > devel/gnome2-hacker-tools (New meta-port consisting of the following): > editors/mlview devel/gnomecommon devel/glade2 > editors/ghex2 devel/regexxer editors/conglomerate > devel/anjuta-devel texproc/meld I guess this's fine too. > deskutils/gnome2-office (New meta port consisting of the following): > math/gnumeric2 deskutils/mrproject [planner] graphics/dia > deskutils/glabels mail/evolution editors/AbiWord2 Definately office package, yes! > Thoughts? I like it. --=20 Pav Lucistnik I have a quantum car. Every time I look at the speedometer I get lost... --=-fucQCjDdwTSTnjfFJxeb Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?= -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQA/+feKntdYP8FOsoIRApDBAKC+WrC8Fmnp8IAfPzK+aO/g1KLRfQCcCvK0 lswj9cF3U0F7oLTNwq4SWE0= =te4K -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-fucQCjDdwTSTnjfFJxeb--