From owner-freebsd-current  Mon Sep 11  6:32:25 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie (salmon.maths.tcd.ie [134.226.81.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 61CBC37B423
	for <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2000 06:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from salmon.maths.tcd.ie by salmon.maths.tcd.ie with SMTP
          id <aa31280@salmon>; 11 Sep 2000 14:32:14 +0100 (BST)
To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@uunet.co.za>
Cc: Steve Ames <steve@virtual-voodoo.com>,
	freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: fwd: [root: security check] 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 11 Sep 2000 13:52:23 +0200."
             <17881.968673143@axl.fw.uunet.co.za> 
X-Request-Do: 
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2000 14:32:14 +0100
From: David Malone <dwmalone@maths.tcd.ie>
Message-ID:  <200009111432.aa31280@salmon.maths.tcd.ie>
Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG

> I seem to recall that David Malone chose mount -p because mount without
> options displayed information about sync- and asyn-c reads and writes.
> Now, mount without options doesn't display this information.

Wasn't me - I was doing seperate things with /etc/security and mount.

> Therefore, I think that we can use mount without options for this check
> in /etc/security.

Sounds like a good idea - we should also consider sorting the
output.  On the positive side you don't get warned when you unmount
and remount a filesystem and it moves to the bottom of the list.
On the negative side you don't get warned when someone else unmounts
and remounts a filesystem and it moves to the bottom of the list. ;-)

	David.


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message