From nobody Wed Dec 22 18:56:31 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-wireless@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C5E7190CC94 for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:56:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbo@insane.engineer) Received: from mail-4022.proton.ch (mail-4022.proton.ch [185.70.40.22]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "protonmail.com", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4JK2c96bWQz4Sxk for ; Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:56:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jbo@insane.engineer) Date: Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:56:31 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=insane.engineer; s=protonmail; t=1640199392; bh=o3UYL+UafH7HGoocrYGpJPJvtLsensPVDTqlVoPS/tg=; h=Date:To:From:Cc:Reply-To:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: References:From:To:Cc; b=g7jlT+eBU/AUoFxRERj9QwV52mAJ9s8dOZSdTWsEnr/+6lh9DG7KPbNB8I6NHQLSr MrtLPGQLYIjZhc/VXNi6wtY5rF4B50DSyXJScJ/+wRuxo/NYycob0OC3l2T2DKOyFy f5ofk8wI5Gp53vGrMidnmcdu9aDffYRj9eDDuAdPq8ZbJxWCdlmr+LblNWQcSVWmgq 3qmZBgnTVlaAMHFKg/5PgNqG4jH75l7+M3fP3yOARdDYcB4eOCjuY1OobUoapvG3fx pvtL+J7tDYQyXKTCvhh2b52kDxzcyvZCptTTakpTNF5z9XhrbLnLgkwtXptb49qw8A Akt7UhAoqquzA== To: "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" From: jbo@insane.engineer Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" Reply-To: jbo@insane.engineer Subject: Re: [iwlwifi] status for stable/13 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <18jzfqXpoMNz4wzM1BS0s9KU5bsKMK2yHKhCgjdLZO4EmgBWhuLBg5f0Aqg64FoGyzVHhai6xsf97NPIcJYsjbNahBvB_11J0e4LeN_VXWA=@insane.engineer> References: <6GZHH3-0KXy_VfdYJOiZ9r5NVkkV-ltK1KDPHhBAz2SodocxC-GtzDskEuKZlyWDkZI8wJSY54Ruv6Do7C-XV92pnY9nDPci9aJsJowtdBg=@insane.engineer> <18jzfqXpoMNz4wzM1BS0s9KU5bsKMK2yHKhCgjdLZO4EmgBWhuLBg5f0Aqg64FoGyzVHhai6xsf97NPIcJYsjbNahBvB_11J0e4LeN_VXWA=@insane.engineer> List-Id: Discussions List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-wireless List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF shortcircuit=no autolearn=disabled version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on mailout.protonmail.ch X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4JK2c96bWQz4Sxk X-Spamd-Bar: --- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; dkim=pass header.d=insane.engineer header.s=protonmail header.b=g7jlT+eB; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=insane.engineer; spf=pass (mx1.freebsd.org: domain of jbo@insane.engineer designates 185.70.40.22 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=jbo@insane.engineer X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.00)[jbo@insane.engineer]; TO_DN_EQ_ADDR_SOME(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[insane.engineer:s=protonmail]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-1.00)[-1.000]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; RWL_MAILSPIKE_GOOD(0.00)[185.70.40.22:from]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip4:185.70.40.0/24]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-0.996]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[insane.engineer:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-1.00)[-1.000]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[insane.engineer,none]; RCVD_COUNT_ZERO(0.00)[0]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:62371, ipnet:185.70.40.0/24, country:CH]; MID_RHS_MATCH_FROM(0.00)[] X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N Hello Bjoern! I was wondering whether you have any status update for us? Unless I missed something the MFCs to stable/13 did not yet happen. I could= n't spot a "cherrypicking-script" either. Thanks again for your hard work! BR, ~ Joel =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original Me= ssage =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 On Tuesday, November 30th, 2021 at 22:59, wrote: > Bjoern, > > Thank you a lot for your quick response. > > I'll gladly wait until we can enjoy the latest iwlwifi efforts on stable/= 13 (either via the upcoming script you mentioned to cherry-pick from HEAD o= r via the later MFCs). > > Thank you a lot for your efforts on this front. It's really appreciated. > > WiFi is definitely the main reason keeping me from using FreeBSD as a dai= ly driver on my laptop(s). > > Keep up the good work! :) > > Best regards, > > ~ Joel > > =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 Original = Message =E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90=E2=80=90 > > On Tuesday, November 30th, 2021 at 01:00, Bjoern A. Zeeb bzeeb-lists@list= s.zabbadoz.net wrote: > > > On Mon, 29 Nov 2021, jbo@insane.engineer wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > On 2021-11-27 I updated stable/13 and tried to apply the setup script= which > > > > > > is supposed to patch the kernel source to make this new driver work. = However, > > > > > > this operation was unsucessful: > > > > ... > > > > > The iwlwifi wiki was updated in the meantime with this note: > > > > > > > 2021-11-28 The driver and firmware went into HEAD (detached from bu= ild) > > > > Also earlier today: > > > > Q: Your latest snapshot no longer applies. What shall I do? > > > > A: We are working on getting all parts into the tree currently. > > > > Please be patient for a few more days. > > > > > My question: As of today, what is the correct way to get the iwlwifi = driver > > > > > > onto a stable/13 system? > > > > There is a hard way resolving the conflicts yourself but read on. > > > > > As per my understaning, HEAD would correspond to > > > > > > -CURRENT which would mean that stable/13 doesn't (yet) have these cha= nges. Will > > > > > > these MFCs show up in the next few days? > > > > Yes. For appropriate values of "few". > > > > My hope is to have everything in main/HEAD/-CURRENT before the end of > > > > this week. > > > > stable/13 will likely get things officially within 14 days of that but = once > > > > it is all in HEAD I may just publish a script for the mean time which w= ill > > > > git cherry-pick the changes needed for stable/13 as the amount of peopl= e > > > > asking for 13 is quite large. So you won't have to wait for the 14 > > > > days for the MFC to happen. > > > > Hope that helps, > > > > Bjoern > > > > Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7