Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:46:24 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Crist J. Clark" <cjc@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>
To:        FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject:   docs/13340: Opaque and incorrect grammar in sh(1)
Message-ID:  <199908240446.AAA01297@cc942873-a.ewndsr1.nj.home.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>Number:         13340
>Category:       docs
>Synopsis:       Opaque and incorrect grammar in sh(1)
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-doc
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          doc-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Aug 23 21:50:01 PDT 1999
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Crist J. Clark
>Release:        FreeBSD 2.2.8-STABLE i386
>Organization:
>Environment:

	2.2.8-STABLE. Verified it still exists in 3.2-STABLE

>Description:

	In the sh(1) manpage, in the portion about 'Functions,' we
	have the following crime against the English language,

                                                                 "Making ``-''
     local any shell options that are changed via the set command inside the
     function to be restored to their original values when the function re-
     turns."

        This sentence has no verb, and I do not understand what it is
        trying to say.

>How-To-Repeat:

	man sh

>Fix:
	
	Since I went to the manpage to read about shell functions and
	I can't understand it... I can't write a correction.


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908240446.AAA01297>