Date: 24 May 1999 19:20:50 +0200 From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no> To: Bart van Leeuwen <bart@ixori.demon.nl> Cc: Tom <tom@uniserve.com>, Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@flood.ping.uio.no>, isdn@freebsd.org, blitz@pdq.net, stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ISDN Terminal adapter no work Message-ID: <xzppv3ql6z1.fsf@localhost.ping.uio.no> In-Reply-To: Bart van Leeuwen's message of "Mon, 24 May 1999 19:01:06 %2B0200 (CEST)" References: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9905241851250.1785-100000@ixori.demon.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bart van Leeuwen <bart@ixori.demon.nl> writes: > Still there are a lot of advantages when using isdn, and esp. when > compared to 2 33k6 connections the fact that its a single connection that > can be setup quickly and requires very little overhead to be managed is > where your potential performance gains are. There was never talk of using two 33k6 modems instead of an ISDN line. Somebody claimed that an ISDN TA was a "very fast modem", to which I replied that the difference was not large enough to warrant the use of the word "very". DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?xzppv3ql6z1.fsf>