From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 14 22:32:15 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AD7516A417 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:32:15 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.229]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD71913C459 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:32:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kurt.buff@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id l8so304371nzf for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:32:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=Dj3dFNm/ncyyXScQkDeXx3vvNrMuRrLC5BLg9DMCApo=; b=XpeHlEPpZcq04V8y47LfamvvRNF0ETNDw5KK5waiaG1IbSgJglypo6znPFbS8peuhKR1xeWS4pMJMQnWrEDL2sEMfel3a3xeMWWO1FOvAxPJhqyszVFLQ/xQC7Pvz9cjmEebd2F0FsIYMbUl8igQLwjjFtp8ZoocJcURbxGXwD4= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=PpXatyEuyhzDc2MFOZAXAPnSI/7o9eLi5a1EJI4yggbDyAUNZSFCJQ6Wo66SeDxYk/NbwMMAz1Y3upk3Ys6A8mmlbEU2mG98kXj816lh0du/s9At6CSMnOoJuXSByIu+yBc3WuiT78Z6osbvwRK9jGzZl0LHMNC4F7k8B2Abdzk= Received: by 10.143.162.8 with SMTP id p8mr1549144wfo.1195079532420; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:32:12 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.142.72.20 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:32:12 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 14:32:12 -0800 From: "Kurt Buff" To: "Jonathan Horne" In-Reply-To: <200711141619.42714.freebsd@dfwlp.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <200711141539.47515.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <200711141543.27342.freebsd@dfwlp.com> <473B6F46.2070509@FreeBSD.org> <200711141619.42714.freebsd@dfwlp.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cups builds on one, but rejected by another? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 22:32:15 -0000 On 11/14/07, Jonathan Horne wrote: > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:57:26 pm Kris Kennaway wrote: > > Jonathan Horne wrote: > > > On Wednesday 14 November 2007 03:39:47 pm Jonathan Horne wrote: > > >> my jails server (6.2-p8) just ran portupgrade fine, and cups was one of > > >> its items it updated: > > >> > > >> [root@canopus ~]# pkg_info | grep cups- > > >> cups-base-1.3.3_2 Common UNIX Printing System > > >> > > >> but my 7.0-b2 desktop, refuses to build the same package: > > >> > > >> ===> cups-base-1.3.3_2 has known vulnerabilities: > > >> => cups -- off-by-one buffer overflow. > > >> Reference: > > >> > >>716 c.html> => Please update your ports tree and try again. > > >> *** Error code 1 > > >> > > >> what would be the differences between the 2 systems that one would build > > >> it, and the other reject the same port? ive not tweaked any port > > >> security settings on either one, so this is some curious behavior to me. > > >> > > >> thanks, > > > > > > another interesting thing, when you read the portaudit page for this, it > > > says: > > > > > > Affects: > > > cups-base <1.3.3_1 > > > > > > but yet 1.3.3_2 still is rejected. > > > > One or the other has either a stale portaudit database or ports tree. > > > > Kris > > what is the method for updating the portaudit database? both have had their > ports trees updated today, the 7.0 box multiple times. > > thanks, > -- > Jonathan Horne > http://dfwlpiki.dfwlp.org > freebsd@dfwlp.com I ran into a similar issue with cups - what does 'portaudit -aF' give on each machine?