From owner-freebsd-firewire@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 28 01:22:44 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C39B9106567F; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from plato.miralink.com (mail.miralink.com [70.103.185.20]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9934E8FC13; Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:22:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from sbruno@miralink.com) Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 096891A9384; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:22:23 -0700 (PDT) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: -4.399 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.399 tagged_above=-10 required=6.6 tests=[ALL_TRUSTED=-1.8, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from plato.miralink.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (plato.miralink.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JbZI3lIGgYD1; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.47.1.10] (vpn.office.miralink.com [10.0.0.5]) by plato.miralink.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 717F91A9144; Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:22:22 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <48659262.8080604@miralink.com> Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:22:42 -0700 From: Sean Bruno User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org, Hidetoshi Shimokawa Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Subject: fwcontrol failure with multiple firewire cards X-BeenThere: freebsd-firewire@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Firewire support in FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Jun 2008 01:22:44 -0000 I noted very strange behavior from all pieces of the firewire stack while testing this week when there are multiple firewire cards in a machine. Before I start submitting patches to fwcontrol/firewire for these issues, is there any signifcant backwards compatibility issues I need to be concerned about? Should I come up with a way to make fwcontrol behave normally unless there is a new argument(eg -B to iterate over multiple cards)? Or is ok to trash the old behavior in favor of one that understands multiple cards? Sean