Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 23:22:02 +1100 (EST) From: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> To: Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Three '450.status-security' scripts enabled by default Message-ID: <20171101230125.R7397@sola.nimnet.asn.au> In-Reply-To: <mailman.78.1509537602.30999.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> References: <mailman.78.1509537602.30999.freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In freebsd-questions Digest, Vol 700, Issue 3, Message: 10 On Wed, 01 Nov 2017 08:06:35 +0900 (JST) Yasuhiro KIMURA <yasu@utahime.org> wrote: > > Thank you for explanation. But in fact today I received 'monthry > > security run output' mail from my home server. And I also checked > > trash folder of my mailbox and confirmed that I recieved 'weekly > > security run output' mail on last Saturday. So there must be something > > that doesn't fit your explanation. > > OMG, again the source of this problem is "pkg". 410.pkg-audit and > 460.pkg-checksum doesn't support security_status_*_period > variable. Therefore they are always executed if > weekly_status_security_enable and/or monthly_status_security_enable is > 'YES' (and they are 'YES' by default). Ahah. After hunting through 10.x and 11.x sources, not finding those, seeing reference to having removed some pkg-* scripts along the way .. What version of FreeBSD are you running? (uname -a) and how was it installed; originally or by freebsd-update or from updated sources? That is, was there an earlier version installed previously? Please show output of: ls -lrt /etc/periodic/security And if there are any older files there, perhaps also the output of: ls -lrtR /etc/periodic cheers, Ian PS: please cc me on replies as I take the daily digest - just arrived.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20171101230125.R7397>