From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 1 08:42:18 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A175E16A4B3; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:42:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ebb.errno.com (ebb.errno.com [66.127.85.87]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C300A43FDF; Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:42:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) Received: from 66.127.85.91 ([66.127.85.91]) (authenticated bits=0) by ebb.errno.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h91FgF0x082477 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:42:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sam@errno.com) From: Sam Leffler Organization: Errno Consulting To: Hajimu UMEMOTO , src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2003 08:40:32 -0700 User-Agent: KMail/1.5.2 References: <200310011513.h91FDU09008281@repoman.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200310011513.h91FDU09008281@repoman.freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200310010840.32893.sam@errno.com> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf files src/sys/netinet6 ip6_id.c ip6_output.c ip6_var.h X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2003 15:42:18 -0000 On Wednesday 01 October 2003 08:13 am, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > ume 2003/10/01 08:13:30 PDT > > FreeBSD src repository > > Modified files: > sys/conf files > sys/netinet6 ip6_output.c ip6_var.h > Added files: > sys/netinet6 ip6_id.c > Log: > randomize IPv6 fragment ID. The cost of doing this was argued extensively on the netbsd mailing lists. In FreeBSD, for IPv4, it is conditional on RANDOM_IP_ID. Is there any reason this is being done for IPv6 other than to defeat attacks? If not can you please make it conditional in the same way? Sam