From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Fri Feb 19 05:32:05 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 242B6AAD86F; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 05:32:05 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: from mail-io0-x22d.google.com (mail-io0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c06::22d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF5E211DF; Fri, 19 Feb 2016 05:32:04 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from adrian.chadd@gmail.com) Received: by mail-io0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id g203so98693833iof.2; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:32:04 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IaB4MlWZnBecGMv02+Cl6vnditF9opdmHRrBLVjMDbs=; b=FmI/+TGdQ8LhFtokkSTaYAB8qO7MgVPEPWRNj6fPAQszkIJFbyqEVQF44KDF5yXhGE Ox2hNX2EFLCEjG4kkDmkMrDV7P23Xe8SYIQbiPqUASUqt4ufdPGFg3zLTA+b3kRoyvef 4qt0igv/V7pe49NnNeLD4TbvSdYoI1IoghiaciIv6xYV5RJPiuPlWGSiIfVwf4nGP6pD OSSVLU8HWfWZx6N+OBhq7IbQRtUEK9k33yMtuMjGz3VGjF8/koJRnWW3B79jm3O9xwEC PltJtHuAXqRlaYrrBcVZn7ffHs89N/u7QsRg+lQZwbGJxvar6j0yeE+EFjB0PfrY/HGX e4Rw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=IaB4MlWZnBecGMv02+Cl6vnditF9opdmHRrBLVjMDbs=; b=j6VliUB/ElDg6qTgGGUv0vC4hY6N7879oilpe1vdjjnmLrwUZO3JEZ1KAIKJ3gl6S+ f4WDQleAZIGOiHogsgkQ/s49dTVA+qvksBtdiNuwhPrSL3XonrSaI5s/JfXs/sV7Zltq x7yF/SkvE4ltxezPCmHM6FaaeYxr3tTAl6Tv2eYDPDWEWQRRiIOPNaJklA2jLFl5cis7 03BJAq5p5SFitEZSGzUzmN8/ZDQosoiuSFtYCiE9k4/sl8FxC2XMrT+VhOukELbKAOyF 3FTzzKAMExYCPo/Y5V0W21aas0KgfdaTBWye3cvxUJycWCwHJRuL74jgd59ZLH29hZgY qUHg== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSqZ83czIOCWUSksPppwbtRNnAIPa5yYoJP7cfwapUcyATDsd2Xwle3HX4xnTnNSA+PEYs2W0HuaCPwUQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.162.144 with SMTP id l138mr12158133ioe.123.1455859924315; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:32:04 -0800 (PST) Sender: adrian.chadd@gmail.com Received: by 10.36.14.19 with HTTP; Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:32:04 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <56C66415.7040407@FreeBSD.org> Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2016 21:32:04 -0800 X-Google-Sender-Auth: PGR0uG4hd_BPK_6T5UowtwwADDA Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r229537 - in head/sys: conf geom/uncompress modules/geom/geom_uncompress From: Adrian Chadd To: Maxim Sobolev Cc: Bryan Drewery , Aleksandr Rybalko , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 19 Feb 2016 05:32:05 -0000 On 18 February 2016 at 21:20, Maxim Sobolev wrote: > Well, what about "do it once, do it right" motto and ongoing code > maintenance cost? Don't you think there should be a balance between those? > Considering how similar the code really is what we've gained in "immediate > availability" department we've already lost since in the time people spend > doing cross merges between those two since 2011. Not even to mention time > wasted by users of the feature dealing with bugs already fixed in the twin > implementation and associated frustration. All that would be eliminated had > this fork never happened. Sure. But someone has to do that, and I made a decision that it was better to commit /something/ than for everyone involved to run out of time and nothing to be committed. eg - a lot of ARM and MIPS work. So yes, I'd love to see it fixed. I mean, heck, I fix up other stuff and I completely forgot that this was still split. But geom_ulzma / geom_gzip actually got us a whole lot of MIPS (and maybe some ARM) users, so I believe it was worthwhile. Thanks, -adrian