Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Jun 2006 02:53:44 -0400
From:      "David Hoffman" <zionicman@gmail.com>
To:        "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=F8rgrav?=" <des@des.no>
Cc:        freebsd-user-groups@freebsd.org, freebsd-misc@freebsd.org, Brett <thisdayislong@gmail.com>, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org, Ingrid Kast Fuller <ingrid@cityscope.net>, freebsd-standards@freebsd.org, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Serious breach of copyright -- First post
Message-ID:  <e8b564e30606192353s7769dc40i12e634fd4c54695a@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <86bqspwkiv.fsf@xps.des.no>
References:  <e8b564e30606181741u1a2e966fw513d49fadc369935@mail.gmail.com> <200606190054.k5J0sm0V014234@ns1.cityscope.net> <f5b151550606181800y57a4fc9fo72f055c3a54e29b8@mail.gmail.com> <e8b564e30606181805n509594ayfc233de5a039521d@mail.gmail.com> <86bqspwkiv.fsf@xps.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Please note that they modified the page several times while I was involved
in this discussion.  That specific comment was about an old revision.

However, the current version of the site still has a problem:  while the
HouFUG copyright notice could be in reference to the page and not the
article, the notice doesn't make that at all clear.  This should be changed=
.

On 6/19/06, Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav <des@des.no> wrote:
>
> "David Hoffman" <zionicman@gmail.com> writes:
> > It'll certainly be less confusing that what HouFUG is
> publishing.  They've
> > now noted on their site that it was written by you.  However, they STIL=
L
> > claim they own the copyright.
>
> No, they claim a copyright for their site, which is perfectly valid -
> look up "compilation copyright" in your favorite search engine.
>
> DES
> --
> Dag-Erling Sm=F8rgrav - des@des.no
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e8b564e30606192353s7769dc40i12e634fd4c54695a>