From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 3 16:36:23 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F2D816A4CE for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:36:23 +0000 (GMT) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net (kanga.honeypot.net [208.162.254.122]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F50D43D39 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 16:36:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from kirk@strauser.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 519B3B8F8 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:36:22 -0600 (CST) Received: from kanga.honeypot.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (kanga.honeypot.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 94344-01 for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:36:21 -0600 (CST) Received: from janus.daycos.com (janus.daycos.com [204.26.70.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-MD5 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by kanga.honeypot.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE9DBB8FA for ; Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:36:21 -0600 (CST) From: Kirk Strauser To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:36:14 -0600 User-Agent: KMail/1.7 References: <20041102222000.GA65845@xor.obsecurity.org> <200411021736.21034.kirk@strauser.com> <20041102234821.GA76782@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20041102234821.GA76782@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart1367778.3z30Bs4yHQ"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200411031036.17792.kirk@strauser.com> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at honeypot.net Subject: Re: HEADS UP: Ports are not ready for CFLAGS=-O2 in 6.0 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2004 16:36:23 -0000 --nextPart1367778.3z30Bs4yHQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Tuesday 02 November 2004 17:48, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Don't know, perhaps they don't care about the fraction of ports that > don't work properly since the rest of them have such eleet > optimization. On the technical end of things, what exactly is it that causes problems wit= h=20 higher-level optimizations? Are they due to bugs in GCC, or obfuscated=20 code that can be interpreted several ways? =2D-=20 Kirk Strauser --nextPart1367778.3z30Bs4yHQ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iD8DBQBBiQkB5sRg+Y0CpvERAgApAJ4uzYVFodMzvBmpCu0y8TMaVqtdwQCdFTNT +MZ/dxqnTwaMyLINkpJWolA= =fXxj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart1367778.3z30Bs4yHQ--