From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Sun Sep 28 05:57:46 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9D31516A4B3; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:57:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from shellma.zin.lublin.pl (shellma.zin.lublin.pl [212.182.126.68])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 5CA9243FF5; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 05:57:43 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl)
Received: by shellma.zin.lublin.pl (Postfix, from userid 1018)
	id B95225F103; Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:00:38 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 15:00:38 +0200
From: Pawel Malachowski <pawmal-posting@freebsd.lublin.pl>
To: ports@freebsd.org
Message-ID: <20030928130038.GA92943@shellma.zin.lublin.pl>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-2
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
cc: sumikawa@FreeBSD.org
cc: bms@freebsd.org
cc: fuzzball@ipv6peer.net
Subject: quagga vs. zebra-pj
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2003 12:57:46 -0000

Hello,

	It looks net/quagga and net/zebra-pj both are the same
ports for quagga, difference is that net/zebra-pj bases on quagga
snapshots and net/quagga uses a release one. How about renaming
net/zebra-pj to net/quagga-devel or something like that?


cheers,
-- 
Paweł Małachowski