From owner-svn-src-head@freebsd.org Sun Sep 20 04:26:10 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FDACA05EE1; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AD6B10A0; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:26:10 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 3A1B01624; Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:26:10 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:26:10 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Adrian Chadd Cc: Bruce Simpson , Hans Petter Selasky , "src-committers@freebsd.org" , Ian Lepore , George Neville-Neil , David Chisnall , Gleb Smirnoff , "svn-src-head@freebsd.org" , "svn-src-all@freebsd.org" Subject: Re: svn commit: r287780 - in head: share/man/man9 sys/kern sys/sys Message-ID: <20150920042609.GA28414@FreeBSD.org> References: <201509141052.t8EAqRWf008293@repo.freebsd.org> <20150916220559.GS1023@FreeBSD.org> <55FA69BD.10507@selasky.org> <0952027A-5276-487D-99B8-74747B0EEF5D@FreeBSD.org> <55FD23C5.5010008@selasky.org> <64D8263B-1F5D-40E5-994C-479C39B69DC9@neville-neil.com> <1442684369.1224.179.camel@freebsd.org> <55FDA1E7.8050007@fastmail.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 11:40:24 +0000 X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Sep 2015 04:26:10 -0000 On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 06:38:46PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > [...] > Hans - personally, I think you should've emailed out a review request > on freebsd-arch@ and put out a request for testers and give a firm date > that you'll commit it. That makes it all very explicit. I agree with general idea of important differentials to be announced on a mail list. There were probably more than one case when interested people did not know about a DR because they were not put on a revievers list and could only comment on the actual commit. ./danfe