From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Aug 7 06:28:36 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2DE5106566B for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:28:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from corky1951@comcast.net) Received: from QMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net (qmta02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net [76.96.62.24]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 713A38FC27 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 06:28:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from OMTA15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.62.87]) by QMTA02.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id RJUc1c0031swQuc52JUcl6; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:28:36 +0000 Received: from comcast.net ([98.203.142.76]) by OMTA15.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net with comcast id RJXt1c0011f6R9u3bJXtZr; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:31:55 +0000 Received: by comcast.net (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Thu, 06 Aug 2009 23:28:33 -0700 Date: Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:28:33 -0700 From: Charlie Kester To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20090807062833.GA75338@comcast.net> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org References: <20090807023726.804e0b17.freebsd@edvax.de> <20090807054909.GD84152@thought.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20090807054909.GD84152@thought.org> X-Mailer: Mutt 1.5.20 X-Composer: VIM 7.2 User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Subject: Re: KDE3 --> KDE4 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 06:28:37 -0000 On Thu 06 Aug 2009 at 22:49:09 PDT Gary Kline wrote: >On Fri, Aug 07, 2009 at 02:37:26AM +0200, Polytropon wrote: >> On Thu, 6 Aug 2009 19:15:18 -0500, Andrew Gould wrote: >> > Unless things have changed very recently, KDE4 is in its own directory >> > folder. >> >> Terminology: the directory (is not a folder, and not a directory folder). >> FreeBSD has directories, not folders. :-) >> > > > Absolutely! I don't want to sound like *that* much of a unix-bigot; but > here, i guess i am. Isn't the word "directory" part of graphy > theory? Or is it just "K&R theory" :-) I'd always assumed it was a term borrowed from the telephone system that was Bell Labs main concern. The list mapping names to telephone numbers (or vice versa) was called a directory, as in "directory assistance". In Unix, the names are filenames and the numbers are inodes.