From owner-freebsd-x11@freebsd.org Sat Oct 6 09:12:19 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F75F10B38A4 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:12:19 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA7148C752 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id 7F23B10B38A3; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:12:18 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: x11@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 44E6B10B38A2 for ; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:12:18 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B42348C74C; Sat, 6 Oct 2018 09:12:17 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from johalun0@gmail.com) Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id 189-v6so3825645wmw.2; Sat, 06 Oct 2018 02:12:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=NBN3phEIlZlqoT8neTb0nCq+Zn/dH95yQo3JLa7fywU=; b=CwpESQ4cv/IW+ikQYB17AsQdui3tvxRvsSyWmCODh2pK52/hDbCkAy2hU66dtbErN9 uFzOiG64+hgsd9kizr3CBhjiCqMToVI5paFXyUmM2jVcOZ9QGe9fAd416wwI6X8qws6f QMvcvAFL/vLEX2TkhXmvFBtNGq9NOTsEiRwauTsig07l+cxSR+H0OpFrUdqJ1UcsVv6Q n6eo4CigjcKX72gfywXD5Esp/WO87BSQ0Hv1qq42SVDnpKkh6ukK6zW4ORKIoxrLfX46 M7O1IBxNOD5Q1w3s4l8fa+FIUzIkti2oHcV8VrwAXyfZJXtf2NpjcDUOnCTHpB2IZ0gC 5pYQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=NBN3phEIlZlqoT8neTb0nCq+Zn/dH95yQo3JLa7fywU=; b=VyMghP1sdB7OqlkyBZcuDjN1E5tpq7iOFZ041De1miFxXG9binMHGxaPgiIpQiAPOI pAshwV5EFAD78VnTmMDXQ7cc5Rv06KsPiJ4ZVfzeZa3HGPb4hb7ZDgXAQAKntuhRlDp0 2VLOoyTYn8bYC4fHXMqDk2iWsUha2c9Ud+dvGUkrpxAZpbJe5oN138UhSAPjy2TjxPkm m7RenAzkW0FF+WLYiXMaBl9R4kWvE8HcZqzcAOJEQ7bFC7aXnqjlIhFGdYEZc0LecaGt LttMloH/8m44DT9SaG/wkVJe9m+h9QV8T+Prao508+YdeNaVpeYMAyD1c6qow7JowBX1 lCGw== X-Gm-Message-State: ABuFfoh0v/2zbkR+6VncYIaOcV2nNZQmEiZEkFAsqhAKqKZQDCTGBb3c itCZ+ZpyYnyBC5uP0PhB+gfyZEPPAzeyP7uxwoYQqw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACcGV62y+I0Xse5k79BRluY8RielWj34ykMDkjYlJEJ+09ApbQP9bI78r9dXYs5wqjbLi6CT8C1F9CVqYer+0pqsWVE= X-Received: by 2002:a1c:5801:: with SMTP id m1-v6mr9845581wmb.118.1538817136611; Sat, 06 Oct 2018 02:12:16 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20181005202837.3e95a61a@kalimero.tijl.coosemans.org> <885d9307-6ac7-72e7-d968-5ea4b9b11a21@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <885d9307-6ac7-72e7-d968-5ea4b9b11a21@gmail.com> From: Johannes Lundberg Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2018 10:11:40 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Should FreeBSD 12 release have evdev support in GENERIC? To: dpolyg Cc: tijl@freebsd.org, x11@freebsd.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.27 X-BeenThere: freebsd-x11@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27 Precedence: list List-Id: X11 on FreeBSD -- maintaining and support List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2018 09:12:19 -0000 On Sat, Oct 6, 2018 at 5:07 AM Denis Polygalov wrote: > Hi, > > having evdev support in GENERIC kernel will advance > things like having Wayland compositor (Weston) to > be used without re-compilation of the kernel and > better support of things like touch-screen input, but > the problem is that currently evdev sometimes cause > troubles: > > https://reviews.freebsd.org/D15070 > > Having troubles in GENERIC kernel is not good... > So I myself will be only happy having evdev enabled, but > because FreeBSD used in many more non-evdev related > applications extra care should be taken in order not to > break things for all these fleets of FreeBSD servers... > It would be nice if at least we could move it from compile time option to a sysctl so it's easier to enable for all the people who want to use it. > Regards, > Denis > > > On 6/10/2018 3:28 AM, T=C4=B3l Coosemans wrote: > > Hi, > > > > It may be a bit late in the release process, but shouldn't FreeBSD 12 > > have evdev support in GENERIC? > > > > device evdev # input event device support > > options EVDEV_SUPPORT # evdev support in legacy drivers > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-x11@freebsd.org mailing list > https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-x11 > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-x11-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >