From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Dec 17 04:31:54 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A888616A418; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:31:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Received: from anthesphoria.net (anthesphoria.net [200.46.204.219]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2368613C457; Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:31:53 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) X-Bogosity: No, tests=bogofilter X-DKIM: Sendmail DKIM Filter v2.3.2 anthesphoria.net lBH4VgRP053125 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=anthesphoria.net; s=phero; t=1197865913; bh=D4M9vRf41tzVla3V3MwLzA7NAtHZIyBD5cWSn5/Zj GY=; l=1062; h=X-Bogosity:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:References:X-Mailer:X-Face:X-Operating-System: Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=gnquJNU/cGc KBDAE+Iq9bFo0BkE9xcWYO2dzZj70/sjBIs7iQi7d9jJqVYzGwL6qCo7HdzZ5G1E/+S vB2z5WfDBDN/wBB69bEPAkQzws+2QGjjZYf/b1ah8Uy4vM21xIHuwyCNYtShZjx5tRI 7Kqh6anRx59vneRPZFO5kTvOvQ= Received: from anthesphoria.net (adsl-202-214.eunet.yu [213.198.202.214]) (authenticated bits=0) by anthesphoria.net (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id lBH4VgRP053125 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:31:45 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from nikola.lecic@anthesphoria.net) Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 05:32:39 +0100 From: Nikola =?UTF-8?B?TGXEjWnEhw==?= To: Stephen Montgomery-Smith , Mark Linimon , Hiroki Sato , bakul@bitblocks.com, albert.shih@obspm.fr, dougb@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071217053239.26110566@anthesphoria.net> In-Reply-To: <4765FA09.8060508@math.missouri.edu> References: <20071216.225955.111308887.hrs@allbsd.org> <20071216202200.51C4F5B2E@mail.bitblocks.com> <20071217.110245.36427121.hrs@allbsd.org> <20071217041040.GA32724@soaustin.net> <4765FA09.8060508@math.missouri.edu> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.1.0 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) X-Face: pbl6-.[$G'Fi(Ogs2xlXP-V6{3||$Y[LOYs&~GJoikj'cVjcFC[V7du;;0~6nO= [Vi2?uU1Pq~,=Adj@,T:|"`$AF~il]J.Nz#2pU',Y7.{B;m/?{#sO^Dvo$rnmY6] X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p8 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: TeTeX and TeXLive X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Dec 2007 04:31:54 -0000 On Sun, 16 Dec 2007 22:24:41 -0600 Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: =20 > Mark Linimon wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 17, 2007 at 11:02:45AM +0900, Hiroki Sato wrote: > >> Do you think splitting it to small packages will be a big problem? > >=20 > > That many ports would create a significant impact on the build > > systems, especially, sparc64, which is not keeping up at all as it > > is. > >=20 > > mcl >=20 > What does the build system do? Does it go to each port one at a time=20 > and do a "make package && pkg_delete -a" or similar? >=20 > If so, this would mean that the, for example, xorg-library port would > be remade many, many times. Unlike Xorg, TeXLive ports are mainly high-level/leaf ports. The impact on other ports will be equal to that of teTeX. The majority of these "portlets" are actually LaTeX packages, fonts, etc, and does not interfere with other ports or among themselves very much. --=20 Nikola Le=C4=8Di=C4=87 :: =D0=9D=D0=B8=D0=BA=D0=BE=D0=BB=D0=B0 =D0=9B=D0=B5= =D1=87=D0=B8=D1=9B