From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Feb 3 18:14:36 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3E8316A418; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from phk.freebsd.dk (phk.freebsd.dk [130.225.244.222]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7552313C4E1; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:14:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (unknown [192.168.61.3]) by phk.freebsd.dk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 149A817104; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.14.2/8.14.2) with ESMTP id m13IEYhv001795; Sun, 3 Feb 2008 18:14:34 GMT (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: Dmitry Morozovsky From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Feb 2008 00:49:08 +0300." <20080202004647.D28725@woozle.rinet.ru> Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:14:34 +0000 Message-ID: <1794.1202062474@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: phk@critter.freebsd.dk Cc: cvs-src@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, cvs-all@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man9 mbuf.9 src/sys/compat/ndis kern_ndis.c src/sys/dev/cxgb cxgb_sge.c src/sys/dev/cxgb/ulp/tom cxgb_cpl_socket.c src/sys/dev/hatm if_hatm_intr.c src/sys/dev/iscsi/initiator isc_soc.c src/sys/dev/lge if_lge.c ... X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 03 Feb 2008 18:14:36 -0000 In message <20080202004647.D28725@woozle.rinet.ru>, Dmitry Morozovsky writes: >Dear Poul-Henning, > >On Fri, 1 Feb 2008, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >PK> No MFC is anticipated. > >Provided current age of 7.* is short enough (and most users of it are aware of >possible API changes) why don't you think MFC to RELENG_7 is suitable? If people see a reason for this, and want to take the battle, fine with me. Given what RELENG_7 has been through already, I'm not going to throw this particular nit under the wheel, in particular since I still don't know if the change (via the sendfile SF_SYNC it enables) makes any difference at all for the Varnish HTTP accellerator which drove this change. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.