From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Dec 24 06:00:57 2015 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFB86A4F496; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 06:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from bigwig.baldwin.cx (bigwig.baldwin.cx [IPv6:2001:470:1f11:75::1]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BC1541D2B; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 06:00:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from ralph.baldwin.cx (c-73-231-226-104.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.226.104]) by bigwig.baldwin.cx (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BD5C1B989; Thu, 24 Dec 2015 01:00:56 -0500 (EST) From: John Baldwin To: cem@freebsd.org Cc: Ravi Pokala , src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r292528 - head/sys/x86/include Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2015 13:29:29 -0800 Message-ID: <19132903.CqPZ5E7ceZ@ralph.baldwin.cx> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.3 (FreeBSD/10.2-STABLE; KDE/4.14.3; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <201512210442.tBL4gw6T007629@repo.freebsd.org> <9D7D1132-ED42-4F37-BEFD-AD62FB6321C7@panasas.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (bigwig.baldwin.cx); Thu, 24 Dec 2015 01:00:56 -0500 (EST) X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2015 06:00:58 -0000 On Monday, December 21, 2015 01:41:35 PM Conrad Meyer wrote: > No, I didn't forget. AVX512VBMI is a flag in ECX > ("cpu_stdext_feature2") rather than EBX ("cpu_stdext_feature"), and > there aren't any macros for any of the ECX flags yet (PREFETCHWT1, > AVX512VBMI, PKU, and OSPKE). Might as well start on them? I would be tempted to just use CPU_STDEXT_foo for those as well. The standard ext leaf allows for multiple "banks" of feature registers, so I'm not sure CPU_STDEXT2_*, etc. will scale all that well. -- John Baldwin