From owner-freebsd-isp Thu Aug 14 16:19:34 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA20329 for isp-outgoing; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:19:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: from vs1.virtualisys.com (virtualisys.com [207.137.172.173]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id QAA20318 for ; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:19:19 -0700 (PDT) Received: from rkntws40casa (pool30.hiper.net [207.137.172.30]) by vs1.virtualisys.com (8.8.7/8.8.5) with SMTP id QAA01032; Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:17:57 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <3.0.3.32.19970814160620.00a35b50@ccsales.com> X-Sender: randyk@ccsales.com X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.3 (32) Date: Thu, 14 Aug 1997 16:06:20 -0700 To: Richard Hodges From: "Randy A. Katz" Subject: Re: Multi-homed - Load Balancing - No Single Point of Failure Cc: isp@FreeBSD.ORG In-Reply-To: References: <3.0.3.32.19970814143306.00b6ac80@ccsales.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk It seems, for some reason, he doesn't consider us valid potential customers. Perhaps he got offended somehow? At 03:08 PM 8/14/97 -0700, Richard Hodges wrote: >On Thu, 14 Aug 1997, Randy A. Katz wrote: > >> How does one do Multi-homed, Load Balancing & No Single Point of Failure >> with Pipeline 130's and Cisco 2501's??? > >Good point. I probably should have changed the subject line because >I was writing about my requirements, which are simple T1 to T1 >connections, which are handled fine with Ascend and cisco. > >I would like to give the serial cards a try, but I am not >impressed by Dennis' rude replies. > >All the best, > >-Richard > >-------------------------------------------- >Richard Hodges | (702) 888-3000 >Alpine Internet | 400 Fairview Drive >rh@alpine.net | Carson City, NV 89701 >member, ISP/C > > >