Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 15:41:37 +0400 From: ark@eltex.ru To: luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it Cc: ark@eltex.ru, oppermann@pipeline.ch, easmith@beatrice.rutgers.edu, kev@lab321.ru, mike@smith.net.au, hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, ipfilter@postbox.anu.edu.au Subject: Re: Packet/traffic shapper ? Message-ID: <199809211141.PAA00299@paranoid.eltex.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <199809211044.MAA02158@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> from "Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it>"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
nuqneH,
It is the fact it is not flexible enough that disturbs me.
I definitely do not like the idea of patching every interface driver.
Luigi Rizzo <luigi@labinfo.iet.unipi.it> said :
> > Ok, it patches _all_ network interface drivers instead of working with
> > ip-level modules.. I definitely _do_not_want_ a thing like this to be
> > in my kernel..
>
> ALTQ has to do this for the way it works. If you don't trust the code,
> fine, but then why would you trust other parts of the OS ?
> Or is it just the fact that it is not integrated with the source tree
> that disturbs you ?
>
> cheers
> luigi
>
> > > > ALTQ is damn ugly. I'd prefer to see something like dummynet interacting
> > >
> > > Please be a little bit more specific with "ALTQ is damn ugly".
>
_ _ _ _ _ _ _
{::} {::} {::} CU in Hell _| o |_ | | _|| | / _||_| |_ |_ |_
(##) (##) (##) /Arkan#iD |_ o _||_| _||_| / _| | o |_||_||_|
[||] [||] [||] Do i believe in Bible? Hell,man,i've seen one!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3i
Charset: noconv
iQCVAwUBNgY7b6H/mIJW9LeBAQG7cgP9Ecr/sCd5+rlHkZOanwcVnZXan0N4/GUY
kZ1TjAxpXCPXnlQqZvZIqQqxa2yQMaMOHion4Sv0ZI+dNNHjVK/v/cmJMsr7JSen
HrYTt7F4z8pAuXWW7uECiRG6IF0LlwxYc+EJOVwpczm+M5E8KdHNGsEEwIhzBvna
DLR6K4eTJuw=
=GTk7
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199809211141.PAA00299>