From owner-svn-src-all@freebsd.org Thu Nov 26 15:37:25 2020 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-all@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3FF44AE974; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: from mail-ot1-f42.google.com (mail-ot1-f42.google.com [209.85.210.42]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "GTS CA 1O1" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4Chhhj4MyXz4d3t; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:37:25 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from asomers@gmail.com) Received: by mail-ot1-f42.google.com with SMTP id 79so2178800otc.7; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 07:37:25 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=zX3xNguAzYtLNPC40kk1tZ2V8v0eRQ9vp0rdD89lkHs=; b=qRUJY1HHh2ctkTK2XUZ6xz/TPb9pn7age6zktBSOsWST+eXJsQdVQAFgAAgTqP892Y AEpVtl7iQPJIB8wwPdbDHIlTcA7J7CjabbOtYIH2jRfYDuTZ/5xbtNByDHIflOl8CaTW Eunecvb5VFjCQMJxWsuowSloWmcWex/0ZLPdWHouRT2lkad/fE4E1yPW97OBtWIqkg2+ hH9333ZkEgWZbT9dBB3ZKmu1mCg+0Q5yr8x41SCEQJlVQCBNlYp3y+vNFjyUglVXKOLC rUSY0aJRlmLLqLu74ehulaA2y0unRh6QbRXw4PIAqEnCVevZbmz58LejBK+cfMSzkQR1 erLA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Cy2K34ZgcrlzvpZThanWfJjR3k7VvSudVfgncnQvshEnz74fO W89uvQUudrQNE2Vl02RehP6u0BcNuhSaXIlTBzRB+/6CsSo= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwLKHOseU0XukweJQu/db/pN3Mw+yvBpHdpwfbqlsFfL+8DiMB83Czry8Q7oZSdJvHvRCHhQeLStgCwggo5O4E= X-Received: by 2002:a9d:3e1b:: with SMTP id a27mr2688902otd.291.1606405044665; Thu, 26 Nov 2020 07:37:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <202011260429.0AQ4TV2B023801@repo.freebsd.org> <20201126092704.f689ac823d6571ca0c98212a@bidouilliste.com> <20201126154931.093e7b5097480d18a01caaf7@bidouilliste.com> In-Reply-To: <20201126154931.093e7b5097480d18a01caaf7@bidouilliste.com> From: Alan Somers Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 08:37:13 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: svn commit: r368045 - in head: . etc/mtree rescue/rescue sbin sbin/ping sbin/ping/tests sbin/ping6 sbin/ping6/tests tools/build/mk To: Emmanuel Vadot Cc: src-committers , svn-src-all , svn-src-head X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4Chhhj4MyXz4d3t X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Content-Filtered-By: Mailman/MimeDel 2.1.34 X-BeenThere: svn-src-all@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: "SVN commit messages for the entire src tree \(except for " user" and " projects" \)" List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2020 15:37:25 -0000 > > > > > I think you should add a LINKS=... here so people script which uses > > > ping6 won't break (and of course adding support in the code to do ipv6 > > > ping if progname is ping6 if this isn't the case). > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > -- > > > Emmanuel Vadot > > > > > > > Yes, that would make sense. But for how long? Would the ping6 hard link > > stick around forever, or eventually be removed in some future version of > > FreeBSD? > > I have no opinion on this matter. > But since ping6 was present for a very long time I guess we're stuck > with it for a long time too. > Do you have an opinion on whether there should be a /rescue/ping6 link too?