From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Feb 26 17:38:02 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47E9316A4CE
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:38:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from root.org (root.org [67.118.192.226])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 088F743D2F
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:38:02 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from nate@root.org)
Received: (qmail 82323 invoked by uid 1000); 27 Feb 2004 01:38:03 -0000
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:38:03 -0800 (PST)
From: Nate Lawson <nate@root.org>
To: Andrey Chernov <ache@nagual.pp.ru>
In-Reply-To: <20040227001854.GA76036@nagual.pp.ru>
Message-ID: <20040226173639.H82318@root.org>
References: <20040219174334.GA60017@nagual.pp.ru>
	<20040227001854.GA76036@nagual.pp.ru>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: roberto@keltia.freenix.fr
cc: current@freebsd.org
cc: des@des.no
Subject: Re: How to deal with deletes between imports (suggestion)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 01:38:02 -0000

On Fri, 27 Feb 2004, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> Well, it looks like this discussion dies silently.
>
> To prevent conflicts I want to inform all interested parties that I plan
> to do it again, now with binutils libiberty (because I add
> getopt_long_only()). I plan to do it in the old way, i.e. removing from
> HEAD, unless I'll hear _constructive_ objections, explaining what to do
> with orphaned vendor files in the previous releases (in case removing from
> VENDOR instead).

I suggest someone talk to the TRB or cvs@ to get an understanding of our
preferred methods of dealing with the cvs tree.  I raised an objection
because your approach differs from what I think is best to reduce
maintenance overhead for future importers but if it fits some larger
FreeBSD plan, I have no problems with it.

-Nate