Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2003 14:26:40 -0800 (PST) From: Dave McCammon <davemac11@yahoo.com> To: Peter Rosa <prosa@pro.sk> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Multiple RealTect adaptors Message-ID: <20031203222640.20733.qmail@web41403.mail.yahoo.com> In-Reply-To: <004201c3b9c3$83141ac0$3501a8c0@pro.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--- Peter Rosa <prosa@pro.sk> wrote: > Hello again, > > of course, everything was there: > dmesg - YES > ifconfig - YES > rc.conf - YES > > But, whenever the machine boots, ifconfig returns: > rl0: flags 8843 <snip> mtu 1500 > inet 192.168.1.11 netmask <snip> > ether <snip> > media <snip> > status: active > rl1: flags 8843 <snip> mtu 1500 > ether <snip> > media <snip> > status: no carrier > > Both have the same flags. Second has no > IP/MSK/BCAST. > > ifconfig rl1 192.168.1.12 netmask 255.255.255.0 > always returns > config: ioctl (SIOCIFADDR): File exists > > What could be wrong ? > > It is the same when I xchange both cards/use another > PCI slots. > > Peter > > I believe it has something to do with the netmask and the interface rl1 being on the same subnet. It should work by giving the interface a subnet of 255.255.255.255. __________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Free Pop-Up Blocker - Get it now http://companion.yahoo.com/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20031203222640.20733.qmail>