Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2001 18:33:17 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: obrien@freebsd.org Cc: Dima Dorfman <dima@unixfreak.org>, hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: MFC'ing new md(4) functionality? Message-ID: <70325.991758797@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 05 Jun 2001 01:31:49 PDT." <20010605013148.A49246@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <20010605013148.A49246@dragon.nuxi.com>, "David O'Brien" writes: >On Mon, Jun 04, 2001 at 07:46:18PM -0700, Dima Dorfman wrote: >> Is there any reason not to MFC the new md(4) functionality > >Zero reason not to. Others see it differently, it would seriously break a lot of people who are using -stable in embedded applications. If we have abandoned the "no changes to API or ABI in -stable" paradigm, it would be a good idea, but it serious rains on that rule... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?70325.991758797>