Date: Fri, 02 Feb 1996 14:17:28 -0800 From: Paul Traina <pst@cisco.com> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: andreas@knobel.gun.de, asami@cs.berkeley.edu, jkh@FreeBSD.org, ports@FreeBSD.org, hackers@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Another Pentium gcc patch, -D__FreeBSD__=2 -Dbsd4_4 Message-ID: <199602022217.OAA12331@puli.cisco.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 02 Feb 1996 21:45:07 %2B0100." <199602022045.VAA23862@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Exactly, the pentium port should ONLY define what the system compiler defines,
and I'm quite happy with what the system compiler currently defines.
(Well, ideally, it wouldn't define __FreeBSD__=2, but wtf)
From: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr>
Subject: Re: Another Pentium gcc patch, -D__FreeBSD__=2 -Dbsd4_4
It seems that Paul Traina said:
> I don't think our current gcc defines bsd4_4, I'm certain it shouldn't. :-)
> There's a well defined way to find out what version of the OS you're runnin
>>g
> under.
I don't think the -D__386BSD__ is correct either.
This is the current #defines:
/usr/libexec/cpp -lang-c -v -undef -D__GNUC__=2 -D__GNUC_MINOR__=6 -Dunix -D
>>i386 -D__FreeBSD__=2 -D__unix__ -D__i386__ -D__FreeBSD__=2 -D__unix -D__i386
>>-Asystem(unix) -Asystem(FreeBSD) -Acpu(i386) -Amachine(i386) foo.c /tmp/cc023
>>835.i
--
Ollivier ROBERT -=- The daemon is FREE! -=- roberto@keltia.frmug.fr.net
FreeBSD keltia.freenix.fr 2.2-CURRENT #1: Sun Jan 14 20:23:45 MET 1996
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199602022217.OAA12331>