From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Dec 20 08:25:41 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id 4846E1065676; Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:25:41 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:25:41 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: Ed Schouten Message-ID: <20081220082541.GB93072@FreeBSD.org> References: <200812191449.mBJEnFOb074699@svn.freebsd.org> <20081219154748.GC1176@hoeg.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20081219154748.GC1176@hoeg.nl> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: svn-src-head@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, src-committers@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras Subject: Re: svn commit: r186322 - head/sys/kern X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 20 Dec 2008 08:25:41 -0000 On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 04:47:48PM +0100, Ed Schouten wrote: > If we're renaming them to <=6-character strings, maybe it's better to > use "ttyin" and "ttybg"? The old TTY code used these strings as well. > > I've also got a small preference of "ttymtx" over "ttylck". "ttymtx" > makes it more clear it is blocked on the mutex, while "lck" could be > literally any form of locking (file locking?). Seconded. ./danfe