From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Wed Dec 5 09:30:24 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A7656130C3AF for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (mailman.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::50:5]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA318C1C7 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) id E9A14130C3AE; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:23 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8185130C3AD for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:3]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6485F8C1C1 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mxrelay.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A881FB649 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118]) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id wB59UMho036094 for ; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) Received: (from www@localhost) by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2/Submit) id wB59UMgL036093 for net@FreeBSD.org; Wed, 5 Dec 2018 09:30:22 GMT (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org) X-Authentication-Warning: kenobi.freebsd.org: www set sender to bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org using -f From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: net@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 233771] Intel x553 100baseTX full-duplex mode not supported Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 09:30:22 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System X-Bugzilla-Component: kern X-Bugzilla-Version: 11.2-RELEASE X-Bugzilla-Keywords: IntelNetworking X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People X-Bugzilla-Who: jeromecharles.lallemand@gmail.com X-Bugzilla-Status: New X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: --- X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: net@FreeBSD.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 3AA318C1C7 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.26 / 15.00]; local_wl_from(0.00)[freebsd.org]; NEURAL_HAM_MEDIUM(-0.53)[-0.533,0]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.03)[0.034,0]; ASN(0.00)[asn:10310, ipnet:2001:1900:2254::/48, country:US]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.76)[0.762,0] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2018 09:30:25 -0000 https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D233771 --- Comment #7 from J=C3=A9r=C3=B4me-Charles LALLEMAND --- The X553 is 1G/100M/10M (not 10G). If I plug the interface on a Cisco inter= face 10/100 with speed auto duplex auto it works and negociate 100-Full. But in my configuration the switch interface is forced in 100-Full and it d= oes not work. On my server: sysctl dev.ix.0.advertise_speed dev.ix.0.advertise_speed: 11 sysctl -d dev.ix.0.advertise_speed dev.ix.0.advertise_speed:=20 Control advertised link speed using these flags: 0x1 - advertise 100M 0x2 - advertise 1G 0x4 - advertise 10G 0x8 - advertise 10M 100M and 10M are only supported on certain adapters. sysctl dev.ix.0.advertise_speed=3D0x1 dev.ix.0.advertise_speed: 11 -> 1 It does not work either. I'm guessing, the duplex is still auto-neg on the = ix0. Any idea to force the speed AND the duplex on this interface ? --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=