From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 29 08:00:01 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 02C0816A4CE for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:00:01 +0000 (GMT) Received: from moutng.kundenserver.de (moutng.kundenserver.de [212.227.126.176]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C71D43D55 for ; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:00:00 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from max@love2party.net) Received: from [212.227.126.206] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bq5pX-0003BH-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:59:59 +0200 Received: from [84.128.138.215] (helo=donor.laier.local) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1Bq5pW-0006nu-00; Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:59:59 +0200 From: Max Laier To: Andrew Riabtsev Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 09:57:50 +0200 User-Agent: KMail/1.6.2 References: <41081955.5090204@schluting.com> <200407282346.12412.max@love2party.net> <1591601893.20040729112527@b-o.ru> In-Reply-To: <1591601893.20040729112527@b-o.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1; boundary="Boundary-02=_F4KCBmpBvE3DSaZ"; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407290957.57276.max@love2party.net> X-Provags-ID: kundenserver.de abuse@kundenserver.de auth:61c499deaeeba3ba5be80f48ecc83056 cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: packet order, ipf or ipfw (offtopic) X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2004 08:00:01 -0000 --Boundary-02=_F4KCBmpBvE3DSaZ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline On Thursday 29 July 2004 09:25, Andrew Riabtsev wrote: > Hello Max, > > Thursday, July 29, 2004, 1:46:06 AM, you wrote: > > ML> Another alternative (on FreeBSD-current) would be pf+ALTQ, btw ;) > Is there any chance to see one day pf for 4.X-RELEASE? I'm still > thinking pf is the best firewall ever made but it is very frustrated i > can't use it on freeBSD boxes. :( > Is there some serios problem on porting pf to 4.X-RELEASE? Or it's > just a question of free time? 4-STABLE is dead, hail to 5-STABLE! ;) Seriously, I have never used 4 and think that 5.3 will mark the beginning o= f a=20 very powerful 5-STABLE branch. So the reason why there is no pf port for 4.= x=20 is, that I am not interested in it. There are efforts to port it to DragonF= ly=20 which is still very close to FreeBSD 4.x in some respects and hence it shou= ld=20 not be too much work to take it from there. Other than that, pf is part of= =20 the KAME-tree and comes with the KAME-snapshots, which are available for 4.= x=20 AFAIK. ALTQ is a problem whichever way you choose. =2D-=20 /"\ Best regards, | mlaier@freebsd.org \ / Max Laier | ICQ #67774661 X http://pf4freebsd.love2party.net/ | mlaier@EFnet / \ ASCII Ribbon Campaign | Against HTML Mail and News --Boundary-02=_F4KCBmpBvE3DSaZ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQBBCK4FXyyEoT62BG0RAuJdAJ9gzNwD1L5ONx86+V/Huei0UXNJTwCePENI brFUEbCCVnBg94TDCUzx2gs= =iOFa -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Boundary-02=_F4KCBmpBvE3DSaZ--