From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 20 15:15: 6 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from patrocles.silby.com (d64.as28.nwbl0.wi.voyager.net [169.207.69.64]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F5C137B403 for ; Mon, 20 May 2002 15:15:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from patrocles.silby.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.3/8.12.3) with ESMTP id g4KMFaWW004112; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:15:36 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from silby@silby.com) Received: from localhost (silby@localhost) by patrocles.silby.com (8.12.3/8.12.3/Submit) with ESMTP id g4KMFTig004109; Mon, 20 May 2002 17:15:30 -0500 (CDT) X-Authentication-Warning: patrocles.silby.com: silby owned process doing -bs Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:15:28 -0500 (CDT) From: Mike Silbersack To: Alfred Perlstein Cc: Doug White , Zhihui Zhang , Subject: Re: kernel daemon clean up In-Reply-To: <20020520220723.GB54960@elvis.mu.org> Message-ID: <20020520171426.Q4105-100000@patrocles.silby.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Mon, 20 May 2002, Alfred Perlstein wrote: > level not edge. I think you can also use the CURSIG macro to check > for pending signals if you don't want to yeild. > > -- > -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] Is any of this documented right now? I had a use for checking whether a kill signal was present for a process inside the vm system a few months back, but didn't believe it was possible without causing side effects. If I can check for signals easily, that would be a big plus. Mike "Silby" Silbersack To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message