From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 20:07:39 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 567D1C5E; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-bn1lp0141.outbound.protection.outlook.com [207.46.163.141]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "mail.protection.outlook.com", Issuer "MSIT Machine Auth CA 2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFC3727E5; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from BY2PR05CA034.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.141.250.24) by BY2PR05MB110.namprd05.prod.outlook.com (10.242.38.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.949.11; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:28 +0000 Received: from BY2FFO11FD044.protection.gbl (2a01:111:f400:7c0c::106) by BY2PR05CA034.outlook.office365.com (2a01:111:e400:2c5f::24) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.959.24 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:22 +0000 Received: from P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (66.129.239.16) by BY2FFO11FD044.mail.protection.outlook.com (10.1.14.229) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.959.15 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:22 +0000 Received: from magenta.juniper.net (172.17.27.123) by P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net (172.24.192.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.146.0; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:06:06 -0700 Received: from chaos.localdomain (chaos.jnpr.net [172.21.16.28]) by magenta.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id s5HK5pn87903; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:05:59 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sjg@juniper.net) Received: from chaos (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by chaos.localdomain (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07542580A1; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:05:51 -0700 (PDT) To: Craig Rodrigues Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 In-Reply-To: References: Comments: In-reply-to: Craig Rodrigues message dated "Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700." From: "Simon J. Gerraty" X-Mailer: MH-E 7.82+cvs; nmh 1.3; GNU Emacs 22.3.1 Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:05:51 -0700 Message-ID: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-EOPAttributedMessage: 0 X-Forefront-Antispam-Report: CIP:66.129.239.16; CTRY:US; IPV:NLI; IPV:NLI; EFV:NLI; SFV:NSPM; SFS:(6009001)(199002)(189002)(84676001)(83072002)(90896003)(85852003)(20776003)(47776003)(102836001)(102176002)(64706001)(92566001)(92726001)(93916002)(86362001)(79102001)(77982001)(70486001)(31966008)(74502001)(80022001)(74662001)(76482001)(21056001)(81342001)(46102001)(77156001)(99396002)(88136002)(69596002)(83322001)(68736004)(44976005)(6806004)(87936001)(62966002)(89996001)(50986999)(81542001)(76176999)(50226001)(50466002)(4396001)(87286001)(97736001)(33656002)(93546004)(101356003)(57986006)(104166001)(81156003)(85306003)(105596002)(95666004)(48376002)(76506005)(42262001); DIR:OUT; SFP:; SCL:1; SRVR:BY2PR05MB110; H:P-EMF02-SAC.jnpr.net; FPR:; PTR:InfoDomainNonexistent; A:1; MX:1; LANG:en; X-Microsoft-Antispam: BL:0; ACTION:Default; RISK:Low; SCL:0; SPMLVL:NotSpam; PCL:0; RULEID: X-Forefront-PRVS: 0245702D7B Received-SPF: SoftFail (: domain of transitioning juniper.net discourages use of 66.129.239.16 as permitted sender) Authentication-Results: spf=softfail (sender IP is 66.129.239.16) smtp.mailfrom=sjg@juniper.net; X-OriginatorOrg: juniper.net X-Mailman-Approved-At: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:27:06 +0000 Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , Brooks Davis , Warner Losh , freebsd-current Current , sjg@juniper.net X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:07:39 -0000 On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >host with bmake? You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in 10. IIRC stable/9 has just enough bmake support to be able to build/install bmake itself, so that ports can use it. I'm not sure how many people would appreciate making such changes to stable/9 at this point. >I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so th >at >I can build ports inside the jail with poudriere. Why not use fmake in that scenario?