From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Mar 26 14:27:33 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from starbug.ugh.net.au (starbug.ugh.net.au [203.31.238.37]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E004C37B41C for ; Tue, 26 Mar 2002 14:27:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8292A809; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:27:26 +1100 (EST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by starbug.ugh.net.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id B48DA5434; Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:27:26 +1100 (EST) Date: Wed, 27 Mar 2002 09:27:26 +1100 (EST) From: Andrew To: Terry Lambert Cc: Dan Nelson , Volker Stolz , Ian , Subject: Re: idprio In-Reply-To: <3CA0D3FE.8113515C@mindspring.com> Message-ID: <20020327092520.V24232-100000@starbug.ugh.net.au> X-WonK: *wibble* MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Tue, 26 Mar 2002, Terry Lambert wrote: > > Sure it can, if the idprio process has locked a vnode trying to update But if system calls aren't preempted under what circumstances can a process hold a vnode lock and then be usurped for processor? Andrew To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message