Date: Mon, 8 Mar 1999 17:10:20 +0930 (CST) From: Kris Kennaway <kkennawa@physics.adelaide.edu.au> To: "Hogan, Thomas E" <tehogan@ingr.com> Cc: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Y2K compliance of FreeBSD version 2.1.0 Message-ID: <Pine.OSF.4.10.9903081708550.30187-100000@bragg> In-Reply-To: <7D1F1CEAECA8D2118013080009B02534AD6AC7@HQ1>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Hogan, Thomas E wrote: > I am working on a Y2K survey for CNN. We have found some systems that are > running FreeBSD version 2.1.0. > > Is this version Y2K compliant? If not, what is the recommended upgrade? 2.1.0 is quite old and no longer supported. You should upgrade the machine to either 2.2.8-STABLE, or (preferably) 3.1-STABLE, which is the current "stable" release, is being actively maintained, and which is believed to be Y2K-compliant. See http://www.freebsd.org for information on the upgrade procedure. Kris ----- (ASP) Microsoft Corporation (MSFT) announced today that the release of its productivity suite, Office 2000, will be delayed until the first quarter of 1901. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.OSF.4.10.9903081708550.30187-100000>