From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 17 20:43:58 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 84A11779; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:43:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-la0-x22c.google.com (mail-la0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4010:c03::22c]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.gmail.com", Issuer "Google Internet Authority G2" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A9F442B66; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:43:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-la0-f44.google.com with SMTP id ty20so2274823lab.17 for ; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject :from:to:cc:content-type; bh=9jCM8J3IyTGyzVB3iLnjgTq8ydZxa1/hYKZwl0ay4+A=; b=KdBSLJM9KtIUqo2Fv6pQcZAVO66UUkoGF2YPZK1Yp9NFxOM0ET1qkXP+mAnBys4j3D IlSCZRi125g4Ys7Ybu/UpaY2Ydu69jCHxZ4p1Wd8wB1fXdfQ8JzFQtZahGREaC0w/ab3 eP4FppYC4rhfxqa34fLACP+3cnSV52qs5+VNZ7k5qMxHDcyJ8j1JaNsq9q7Co9lGWF11 AHMFY1R3KY448W6HyVz7M/3NuMTtcs486rBdPzlyD242j83PJ/EY77Bb3F7K89kO2Zr5 tad0ziq4Jm/aEvTaAUDAwj62acjyVF6wyPMJ+Q0UhAIbiVdItpbGtgIAVulIeolvufQG OQYw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.43.135 with SMTP id w7mr20745389lal.32.1403037835467; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Sender: crodr001@gmail.com Received: by 10.112.67.73 with HTTP; Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> References: <20140617200551.07542580A1@chaos.localdomain> Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 13:43:55 -0700 X-Google-Sender-Auth: ACHjY76_kN3BClnCGyK7wG0U84o Message-ID: Subject: Re: Problems building FreeBSD 9.2 on FreeBSD 10 From: Craig Rodrigues To: "Simon J. Gerraty" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Marcel Moolenaar , Brooks Davis , Warner Losh , freebsd-current Current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2014 20:43:58 -0000 On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:05 PM, Simon J. Gerraty wrote: > > On Tue, 17 Jun 2014 11:35:42 -0700, Craig Rodrigues writes: >>Do you know if there is some sort of patch that can be applied to >>FreeBSD stable/9 sources so that it can be built on a FreeBSD >>10/stable, or FreeBSD CURRENT >>host with bmake? > > You would likely need to apply many of the changes made in 10. > IIRC stable/9 has just enough bmake support to be able to build/install > bmake itself, so that ports can use it. > > I'm not sure how many people would appreciate making such changes to > stable/9 at this point. Most users would not care about building stable/9 on a stable/10 host. There are only a few people care about being able to do that. People who use poudriere to build a jail to build ports would care. People who are building products base on stable/9, but need to use a stable/10 (or newer) host would care, but that number of people is small. > >>I'm trying to build a FreeBSD stable/9 jail on a FreeBSD 10/stable host, so th >>at >>I can build ports inside the jail with poudriere. > > Why not use fmake in that scenario? That might work. Is using the devel/fmake port sufficient for using fmake? If I typed "make something", is there a way inside the make environment to detect if bmake or fmake was invoked, and error out appropriately? -- Craig