From owner-svn-src-head@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jan 30 13:21:58 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B6271065670; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:21:58 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from smtp-1.dlr.de (smtp-1.dlr.de [195.37.61.185]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E09978FC12; Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:21:57 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from Hartmut.Brandt@dlr.de) Received: from [129.247.12.11] ([129.247.12.11]) by smtp-1.dlr.de with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:21:55 +0100 Message-ID: <4982FEF1.2000309@dlr.de> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:21:53 +0100 From: Hartmut Brandt Organization: German Aerospace Center User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (Windows/20081209) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Erik Trulsson References: <200901130653.n0D6rrNX092719@svn.freebsd.org> <20090130015518.GA20404@hades.panopticon> <20090130113402.GB92386@dragon.NUXI.org> <9bbcef730901300402q61273d58q76472e585985fc3c@mail.gmail.com> <20090130123711.GA89940@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20090130123711.GA89940@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 30 Jan 2009 13:21:55.0821 (UTC) FILETIME=[B8E5A1D0:01C982DD] Cc: src-committers@freebsd.org, svn-src-all@freebsd.org, obrien@freebsd.org, Dmitry Marakasov , Ivan Voras , svn-src-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r187132 - head/usr.bin/make X-BeenThere: svn-src-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the src tree for head/-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 13:21:59 -0000 Erik Trulsson wrote: > On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 01:02:15PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: >> 2009/1/30 David O'Brien : >> >>> compiler invocation must really bug you. Perhaps we should have the >>> quiet out put of the ncftp3 build where every complication takes only >>> 1 line: >>> >>> Compiling DStrCat.so: [OK] >>> Compiling DStrFree.so: [OK] >>> Compiling Dynscpy.so: [OK] >>> Compiling Strncpy.so: [OK] >>> Compiling strtokc.so: [OK] >>> ..snip.. >> I'd vote for that being the default :) > > I would not. In fact I am quite happy that is not the default. > >> It's also the mode used by Linux kernel (note that it's not a pro or a >> contra argument in itself), e.g. > > True, and it is a PITA when there is a problem with the compilation, since > you need to add extra flags to the verbose output so you can find out what > flags the compiler actually was invoked with. I took that vote as a joke. It may only be a joke, right? harti