Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2019 20:47:31 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 238037] [PATCH] Implement ig4 suspend/resume Message-ID: <bug-238037-227-k21pS9AVkL@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-238037-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-238037-227@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D238037 --- Comment #4 from Andriy Gapon <avg@FreeBSD.org> --- (In reply to J.R. Oldroyd from comment #3) Do those barriers make any difference at all (given x86 platform) ? Also, it would make sense -- if only for consistency -- to pass IG4_REG_RESETS_SKL to the barrier when accessing that register. --=20 You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-238037-227-k21pS9AVkL>