From owner-freebsd-net Wed May 13 01:14:41 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id BAA08365 for freebsd-net-outgoing; Wed, 13 May 1998 01:14:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from ifi.uio.no (0@ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA07845; Wed, 13 May 1998 01:12:44 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from dag-erli@ifi.uio.no) Received: from hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no (2602@hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no [129.240.64.130]) by ifi.uio.no (8.8.8/8.8.7/ifi0.2) with ESMTP id KAA29269; Wed, 13 May 1998 10:12:19 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from dag-erli@localhost) by hindarfjell.ifi.uio.no ; Wed, 13 May 1998 10:12:19 +0200 (MET DST) Mime-Version: 1.0 To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Cc: Ollivier Robert , core@FreeBSD.ORG, net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: INRIA IPv6 on FreeBSD References: <6876.895046243@time.cdrom.com> Organization: University of Oslo, Department of Informatics X-url: http://www.stud.ifi.uio.no/~dag-erli/ X-Stop-Spam: http://www.cauce.org From: dag-erli@ifi.uio.no (Dag-Erling Coidan =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sm=F8rgrav?= ) Date: 13 May 1998 10:12:18 +0200 In-Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard"'s message of "Wed, 13 May 1998 00:57:23 -0700" Message-ID: Lines: 14 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org "Jordan K. Hubbard" writes: > Sigh.. If we're to get any further with this, we really really need > to get out of the realm of the political ("xxx is running our stack! > We're #1!" :-) and into the realm of the technical. WHY is it better > than the WIDE stuff? How and where? What are the _specific points of > comparison_ that we need to be aware of? Jordan, this is precisely what I am trying to do: compare the two implementations and find out where and how they differ. However, I need approval from above to do that. I'm going to do everything I can to get that approval. -- Noone else has a .sig like this one. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message